Wow this comment made my head spin bsuacee you just butchered the English language. How can you respond to an article about grammar with horrible grammar? Number one: it’s you’re, as in you are, and a lot, as in two words. You also chose to avoid using punctuation correctly, so your comment looked like you just threw up on the screen as opposed to putting together any logical thought. I understand it’s not always essential to write perfectly online, as I am part of the information generation after all, but you just exemplified this writer’s grievances. And finally, were you kidding by writing gud and nd?? I just didn’t get it. I hate to be so brash but come on, you just assaulted this article. And yes, I meant assaulted, not insulted.
Wow this comment made my head spin bsuacee you just butchered the English language. How can you respond to an article about grammar with horrible grammar? Number one: it’s you’re, as in you are, and a lot, as in two words. You also chose to avoid using punctuation correctly, so your comment looked like you just threw up on the screen as opposed to putting together any logical thought. I understand it’s not always essential to write perfectly online, as I am part of the information generation after all, but you just exemplified this writer’s grievances. And finally, were you kidding by writing gud and nd?? I just didn’t get it. I hate to be so brash but come on, you just assaulted this article. And yes, I meant assaulted, not insulted.
[Reply]